Get ready for another fist-pumping gorilla juicehead to hit the shore in 2030 or so, because Snooki is having a baby boy!
The "Jersey Shore" star revealed her exciting baby news to In Touch, saying, “Everyone said I was going to have a boy, and they were right!”
Though she admitted she was a bit disappointed at first -- she said she was hoping for a little girl -- she's now thrilled and can't wait to meet her little one, who will likely be named either Lorenzo or Jionni Jr., after her fiance Jionni LaValle.
The baby boy news comes just weeks after Snooki was spotted shopping for pink baby products, leading many fans to wonder if a mini-Snooki was on the way, but perhaps she was just browsing.
Thanks to Twitter, fans have been able to follow along with the star's pregnancy, and Snooki has been fairly open about discussing her journey into motherhood.
"Ah I can't wait to see my little one whose either going to be a dedicated cheerleader like mommy or a strong wrestler like daddy," she tweeted April 2.
But will we be seeing Snooki this summer at the now-legendary "Jersey Shore" house in Seaside Heights? According to the E!, she'll be there -- she just won't be living at the house with the cast. She'll reportedly be living in a house nearby, presumably so she can take care of herself during the final months of her pregnancy.
For more on Snooki's exciting baby news, head over to In Touch, and don't miss their new issue, on newsstands now.
THANK GOD SNOOKI IS HAVING A BABY BOY CAUSE LORD KNOWS WE DONT NEED HER TEACHING A GIRL HOW TO BE JUST LIKE HER. I SO THINK THAT SNOOKI IS KILLING HER CAREER BY HAVING A BABY & GETTING MARRIED AT SUCH A YONG AGE. AND WHAT THE HELL WILL SHE BE DOING AT THE SHORE HOUSE 8MON PREGGOS, IM QUITE SURE SHELL BE DRINKING WHILE PREGGOS. WINE IN THE DELIVERY ROOM SMH!
Snooki's $100 Million Deal Backfired
Court documents examined by HuffPost Celebrity reveal new details about Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi's October 2011 lawsuit: The star claims that a licensing company led her to believe that she could make $100 million over three years if she signed with the firm. Instead, she earned just $250,000 and decided to sue.
SRG Ventures fought back in December, filing a $7 million counterclaim against Snooki that accuses her of sabotaging the deals the firm was trying to make with several brands.
Snooki's original legal filing also claims (rather surprisingly) that any association with an alcohol brand would be unacceptable to her and inappropriate for her image. In the filing, Snooki is described as "a crowd favorite" who "is now one of the most recognizable faces in the entertainment industry."
"Snooki filed a suit in October 2011 to end her relationship with SRG, as they didn’t deliver the deals or money they had led her to expect she would receive," a friend of the "Jersey Shore" star tells me. "Now she’s fighting back against the counterclaim that she didn't hold up her side of the agreement."
According to court documents cited by the New York Post, SRG is arguing that Snooki's unladylike behavior, culminating in her 2010 arrest for disorderly conduct, made it difficult to find brands that wanted to be associated with her. Disney, Macy's and Target were among those the firm claims to have approached.
But Snooki's lawyers contend that's just an excuse. "Ms. Polizzi recently filed claims for fraud and breach of contract against SRG," Snooki's attorney Brian Procel told me. "The court papers allege that SRG lied about their connections in the industry and failed to secure licensing agreements in accordance with the parties' written contract. We intend to litigate this case aggressively -- SRG's attempt to take advantage of Ms. Polizzi will not be tolerated."
Snooki's original legal filing also claims (rather surprisingly) that any association with an alcohol brand would be unacceptable to her and inappropriate for her image. In the filing, Snooki is described as "a crowd favorite" who "is now one of the most recognizable faces in the entertainment industry."
"Snooki filed a suit in October 2011 to end her relationship with SRG, as they didn’t deliver the deals or money they had led her to expect she would receive," a friend of the "Jersey Shore" star tells me. "Now she’s fighting back against the counterclaim that she didn't hold up her side of the agreement."
According to court documents cited by the New York Post, SRG is arguing that Snooki's unladylike behavior, culminating in her 2010 arrest for disorderly conduct, made it difficult to find brands that wanted to be associated with her. Disney, Macy's and Target were among those the firm claims to have approached.
But Snooki's lawyers contend that's just an excuse. "Ms. Polizzi recently filed claims for fraud and breach of contract against SRG," Snooki's attorney Brian Procel told me. "The court papers allege that SRG lied about their connections in the industry and failed to secure licensing agreements in accordance with the parties' written contract. We intend to litigate this case aggressively -- SRG's attempt to take advantage of Ms. Polizzi will not be tolerated."
No comments:
Post a Comment